Did Bolton Blow North Korea?

Authored by Ron Paul via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

President Trump’s second summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un last week was criticized by both parties in Washington long before Air Force One even touched down in Hanoi. Washington’s political class seemed terrified that the nearly 70 year state of “war” with North Korea might actually end. In the end the only positive thing they could say about the meeting was that Trump apparently walked away with nothing to show for it.

The location of the meeting – Hanoi, Vietnam – serves as a great example of what can be won in peace versus what is lost in war. After losing nearly 60,000 US service members in an unnecessary war that took a million Vietnamese lives, the US loss of the Vietnam war resulted not in a communist takeover of southeast Asia but something very different: the domino theory failed because communism was destined to fail. Now we are close trading partners with an increasingly pro-market Vietnam. The result of trade and exchange versus war is a better life for all.

Unfortunately for Washington, the real lesson of Vietnam has not been learned. That is why the Republicans, Democrats, and the entire mainstream media spoke as one against President Trump’s decision to take a bold step and actually meet again, one-on-one, with one of our “enemies” to see if we can avoid nuclear conflict.

One leading Democrat, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), attacked Trump for meeting with Kim because speaking to the North Korean “gives him legitimacy.” Does it make any sense that we should not even speak with our nuclear-armed adversaries because it gives them “legitimacy”? He’d rather have a nuclear war as long as Kim remains “illegitimate”? This is sadly the kind of thinking that prevails in Washington.

The media reported that Trump walked away from the meeting before the scheduled signing ceremony and closing press event. The talks broke down, it was reported, because Kim demanded an end to all sanctions before any reduction in North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. Washington sighed with relief and said all together, “better no deal than a bad deal.”

Meanwhile the North Koreans held a rare press conference clarifying that they only asked for partial sanctions relief in exchange for dismantling one of their main nuclear facilities. Further, press reports began to surface that National Security Advisor John Bolton threw additional demands on the table which led Kim to draw the meeting to an early close.

Who’s telling the truth? We likely won’t know. But given Bolton’s strong opposition to any kind of peace agreement with North Korea it’s hard to doubt that he had something to do with the blow-up of the summit. As the New York Times reported over the weekend, while Trump’s advisors were shocked when he decided to meet Kim face-to-face the first time for negotiations, John Bolton wasn’t worried at all. As the Times writes, “Mr. Bolton told colleagues not to worry. The negotiations, he said, would collapse on their own.” And so they did.

Will Trump continue to allow his diplomatic efforts to be undermined by his own staff? Let’s hope the president will ignore Washington, ignore the neocons, and continue to work for peace with North Korea.

Did Bolton Blow North Korea? <body> <h1> Array ( [0] => sid bolton blow north korea? [1] => xid bolton blow north korea? [2] => cid bolton blow north korea? [3] => fid bolton blow north korea? [4] => rid bolton blow north korea? [5] => eid bolton blow north korea? [6] => dud bolton blow north korea? [7] => djd bolton blow north korea? [8] => dkd bolton blow north korea? [9] => dod bolton blow north korea? [10] => d9d bolton blow north korea? [11] => d8d bolton blow north korea? [12] => dis bolton blow north korea? [13] => dix bolton blow north korea? [14] => dic bolton blow north korea? [15] => dif bolton blow north korea? [16] => dir bolton blow north korea? [17] => die bolton blow north korea? [18] => did volton blow north korea? [19] => did nolton blow north korea? [20] => did holton blow north korea? [21] => did golton blow north korea? [22] => did bilton blow north korea? [23] => did bklton blow north korea? [24] => did bllton blow north korea? [25] => did bplton blow north korea? [26] => did b0lton blow north korea? [27] => did b9lton blow north korea? [28] => did bokton blow north korea? [29] => did bopton blow north korea? [30] => did booton blow north korea? [31] => did bolron blow north korea? [32] => did bolfon blow north korea? [33] => did bolgon blow north korea? [34] => did bolyon blow north korea? [35] => did bol6on blow north korea? [36] => did bol5on blow north korea? [37] => did boltin blow north korea? [38] => did boltkn blow north korea? [39] => did boltln blow north korea? [40] => did boltpn blow north korea? [41] => did bolt0n blow north korea? [42] => did bolt9n blow north korea? [43] => did boltob blow north korea? [44] => did boltom blow north korea? [45] => did boltoj blow north korea? [46] => did boltoh blow north korea? [47] => did bolton vlow north korea? [48] => did bolton nlow north korea? [49] => did bolton hlow north korea? [50] => did bolton glow north korea? [51] => did bolton bkow north korea? [52] => did bolton bpow north korea? [53] => did bolton boow north korea? [54] => did bolton bliw north korea? [55] => did bolton blkw north korea? [56] => did bolton bllw north korea? [57] => did bolton blpw north korea? [58] => did bolton bl0w north korea? [59] => did bolton bl9w north korea? [60] => did bolton bloq north korea? [61] => did bolton bloa north korea? [62] => did bolton blos north korea? [63] => did bolton bloe north korea? [64] => did bolton blo3 north korea? [65] => did bolton blo2 north korea? [66] => did bolton blow borth korea? [67] => did bolton blow morth korea? [68] => did bolton blow jorth korea? [69] => did bolton blow horth korea? [70] => did bolton blow nirth korea? [71] => did bolton blow nkrth korea? [72] => did bolton blow nlrth korea? [73] => did bolton blow nprth korea? [74] => did bolton blow n0rth korea? [75] => did bolton blow n9rth korea? [76] => did bolton blow noeth korea? [77] => did bolton blow nodth korea? [78] => did bolton blow nofth korea? [79] => did bolton blow notth korea? [80] => did bolton blow no5th korea? [81] => did bolton blow no4th korea? [82] => did bolton blow norrh korea? [83] => did bolton blow norfh korea? [84] => did bolton blow norgh korea? [85] => did bolton blow noryh korea? [86] => did bolton blow nor6h korea? [87] => did bolton blow nor5h korea? [88] => did bolton blow nortg korea? [89] => did bolton blow nortb korea? [90] => did bolton blow nortn korea? [91] => did bolton blow nortj korea? [92] => did bolton blow nortu korea? [93] => did bolton blow norty korea? [94] => did bolton blow north jorea? [95] => did bolton blow north morea? [96] => did bolton blow north lorea? [97] => did bolton blow north oorea? [98] => did bolton blow north iorea? [99] => did bolton blow north kirea? [100] => did bolton blow north kkrea? [101] => did bolton blow north klrea? [102] => did bolton blow north kprea? [103] => did bolton blow north k0rea? [104] => did bolton blow north k9rea? [105] => did bolton blow north koeea? [106] => did bolton blow north kodea? [107] => did bolton blow north kofea? [108] => did bolton blow north kotea? [109] => did bolton blow north ko5ea? [110] => did bolton blow north ko4ea? [111] => did bolton blow north korwa? [112] => did bolton blow north korsa? [113] => did bolton blow north korda? [114] => did bolton blow north korra? [115] => did bolton blow north kor4a? [116] => did bolton blow north kor3a? [117] => did bolton blow north korez? [118] => did bolton blow north kores? [119] => did bolton blow north korew? [120] => did bolton blow north koreq? ) </h1> </body>