Wealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’

August 21, 2024

Businessman Mark Jukes, 61, wanted to build the four properties for his three girls and sister on a field next to their plush family home in Cardigan, west Wales.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13764743/wealth-father-bonkers-housing-plan-daughters-refused-wales.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

qealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, aealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, sealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, eealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, 3ealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, 2ealthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wwalthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wsalthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wdalthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wralthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, w4althy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, w3althy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wezlthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weslthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wewlthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weqlthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weakthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weapthy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weaothy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealrhy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealfhy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealghy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealyhy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weal6hy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, weal5hy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtgy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtby businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtny businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtjy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtuy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtyy businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealtht businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthg businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthh businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthu businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealth7 businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealth6 businessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy vusinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy nusinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy husinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy gusinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bysinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bhsinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bjsinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bisinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy b8sinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy b7sinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy buainessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy buzinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy buxinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy budinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bueinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy buwinessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busunessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busjnessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busknessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busonessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bus9nessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy bus8nessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busibessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busimessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busijessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busihessman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businwssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businsssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busindssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businrssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busin4ssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busin3ssman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busineasman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businezsman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businexsman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businedsman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busineesman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businewsman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businesaman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busineszman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businesxman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businesdman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busineseman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy busineswman who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessnan who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businesskan who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessjan who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmzn who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmsn who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmwn who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmqn who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmab who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmam who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmaj who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessmah who wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman qho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman aho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman sho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman eho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman 3ho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman 2ho wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wgo wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wbo wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wno wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wjo wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wuo wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wyo wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman whi wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman whk wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman whl wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman whp wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wh0 wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman wh9 wants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who qants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who aants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who sants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who eants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who 3ants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who 2ants to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who wznts to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who wsnts to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who wwnts to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’, wealthy businessman who wqnts to build four new homes for his three daughters and sister is refused planning permission because ‘bonkers’ £1.6m development is not ‘affordable’