DAN HODGES: If Starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about Mandelson, he should resign

September 11, 2025

What did Keir Starmer know and when? They are the questions the PM must answer as his attempts to defend his ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson collapse around him.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086363/DAN-HODGES-Starmer-Mandelson-resign.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

DAN HODGES: If Starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about Mandelson, he should resign <body> <h1> Array ( [0] => san hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [1] => xan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [2] => can hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [3] => fan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [4] => ran hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [5] => ean hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [6] => dzn hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [7] => dsn hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [8] => dwn hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [9] => dqn hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [10] => dab hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [11] => dam hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [12] => daj hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [13] => dah hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [14] => dan godges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [15] => dan bodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [16] => dan nodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [17] => dan jodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [18] => dan uodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [19] => dan yodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [20] => dan hidges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [21] => dan hkdges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [22] => dan hldges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [23] => dan hpdges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [24] => dan h0dges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [25] => dan h9dges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [26] => dan hosges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [27] => dan hoxges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [28] => dan hocges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [29] => dan hofges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [30] => dan horges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [31] => dan hoeges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [32] => dan hodfes: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [33] => dan hodves: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [34] => dan hodbes: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [35] => dan hodhes: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [36] => dan hodyes: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [37] => dan hodtes: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [38] => dan hodgws: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [39] => dan hodgss: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [40] => dan hodgds: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [41] => dan hodgrs: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [42] => dan hodg4s: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [43] => dan hodg3s: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [44] => dan hodgea: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [45] => dan hodgez: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [46] => dan hodgex: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [47] => dan hodged: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [48] => dan hodgee: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [49] => dan hodgew: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [50] => dan hodges: uf starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [51] => dan hodges: jf starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [52] => dan hodges: kf starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [53] => dan hodges: of starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [54] => dan hodges: 9f starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [55] => dan hodges: 8f starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [56] => dan hodges: id starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [57] => dan hodges: ic starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [58] => dan hodges: iv starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [59] => dan hodges: ig starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [60] => dan hodges: it starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [61] => dan hodges: ir starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [62] => dan hodges: if atarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [63] => dan hodges: if ztarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [64] => dan hodges: if xtarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [65] => dan hodges: if dtarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [66] => dan hodges: if etarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [67] => dan hodges: if wtarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [68] => dan hodges: if srarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [69] => dan hodges: if sfarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [70] => dan hodges: if sgarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [71] => dan hodges: if syarmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [72] => dan hodges: if s6armer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [73] => dan hodges: if s5armer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [74] => dan hodges: if stzrmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [75] => dan hodges: if stsrmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [76] => dan hodges: if stwrmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [77] => dan hodges: if stqrmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [78] => dan hodges: if staemer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [79] => dan hodges: if stadmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [80] => dan hodges: if stafmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [81] => dan hodges: if statmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [82] => dan hodges: if sta5mer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [83] => dan hodges: if sta4mer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [84] => dan hodges: if starner can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [85] => dan hodges: if starker can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [86] => dan hodges: if starjer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [87] => dan hodges: if starmwr can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [88] => dan hodges: if starmsr can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [89] => dan hodges: if starmdr can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [90] => dan hodges: if starmrr can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [91] => dan hodges: if starm4r can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [92] => dan hodges: if starm3r can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [93] => dan hodges: if starmee can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [94] => dan hodges: if starmed can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [95] => dan hodges: if starmef can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [96] => dan hodges: if starmet can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [97] => dan hodges: if starme5 can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [98] => dan hodges: if starme4 can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [99] => dan hodges: if starmer xan’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [100] => dan hodges: if starmer van’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [101] => dan hodges: if starmer fan’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [102] => dan hodges: if starmer dan’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [103] => dan hodges: if starmer czn’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [104] => dan hodges: if starmer csn’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [105] => dan hodges: if starmer cwn’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [106] => dan hodges: if starmer cqn’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [107] => dan hodges: if starmer cab’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [108] => dan hodges: if starmer cam’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [109] => dan hodges: if starmer caj’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [110] => dan hodges: if starmer cah’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [111] => dan hodges: if starmer canᰱt (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [112] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#u217;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [113] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#i217;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [114] => dan hodges: if starmer can␁t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [115] => dan hodges: if starmer can᾵t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [116] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#8q17;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [117] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#8w17;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [118] => dan hodges: if starmer can⁽t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [119] => dan hodges: if starmer can‣t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [120] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#82q7;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [121] => dan hodges: if starmer can‘t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [122] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#821y;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [123] => dan hodges: if starmer can&#821u;t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [124] => dan hodges: if starmer can‚t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [125] => dan hodges: if starmer can’r (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [126] => dan hodges: if starmer can’f (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [127] => dan hodges: if starmer can’g (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [128] => dan hodges: if starmer can’y (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [129] => dan hodges: if starmer can’6 (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [130] => dan hodges: if starmer can’5 (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [131] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (ir won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [132] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (kr won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [133] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (lr won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [134] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (pr won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [135] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (0r won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [136] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (9r won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [137] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (oe won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [138] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (od won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [139] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (of won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [140] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (ot won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [141] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (o5 won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [142] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (o4 won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [143] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or qon’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [144] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or aon’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [145] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or son’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [146] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or eon’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [147] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or 3on’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [148] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or 2on’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [149] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or win’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [150] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wkn’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [151] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wln’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [152] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wpn’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [153] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or w0n’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [154] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or w9n’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [155] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wob’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [156] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wom’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [157] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or woj’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [158] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or woh’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [159] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or wonᰱt) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [160] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#u217;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [161] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#i217;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [162] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won␁t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [163] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won᾵t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [164] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#8q17;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [165] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#8w17;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [166] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won⁽t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [167] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won‣t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [168] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#82q7;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [169] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won‘t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [170] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#821y;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [171] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won&#821u;t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [172] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won‚t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [173] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’r) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [174] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’f) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [175] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’g) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [176] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’y) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [177] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’6) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [178] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’5) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [179] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) rell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [180] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) fell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [181] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) gell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [182] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) yell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [183] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) 6ell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [184] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) 5ell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [185] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) twll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [186] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tsll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [187] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tdll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [188] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) trll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [189] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) t4ll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [190] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) t3ll us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [191] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tekl us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [192] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tepl us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [193] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) teol us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [194] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) telk us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [195] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) telp us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [196] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) telo us what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [197] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell ys what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [198] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell hs what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [199] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell js what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [200] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell is what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [201] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell 8s what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [202] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell 7s what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [203] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell ua what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [204] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell uz what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [205] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell ux what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [206] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell ud what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [207] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell ue what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [208] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell uw what he knew about mandelson, he should resign [209] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us qhat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [210] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us ahat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [211] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us shat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [212] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us ehat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [213] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us 3hat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [214] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us 2hat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [215] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wgat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [216] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wbat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [217] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wnat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [218] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wjat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [219] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wuat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [220] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wyat he knew about mandelson, he should resign [221] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whzt he knew about mandelson, he should resign [222] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whst he knew about mandelson, he should resign [223] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whwt he knew about mandelson, he should resign [224] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whqt he knew about mandelson, he should resign [225] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whar he knew about mandelson, he should resign [226] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whaf he knew about mandelson, he should resign [227] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whag he knew about mandelson, he should resign [228] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us whay he knew about mandelson, he should resign [229] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wha6 he knew about mandelson, he should resign [230] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us wha5 he knew about mandelson, he should resign [231] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what ge knew about mandelson, he should resign [232] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what be knew about mandelson, he should resign [233] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what ne knew about mandelson, he should resign [234] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what je knew about mandelson, he should resign [235] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what ue knew about mandelson, he should resign [236] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what ye knew about mandelson, he should resign [237] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what hw knew about mandelson, he should resign [238] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what hs knew about mandelson, he should resign [239] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what hd knew about mandelson, he should resign [240] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what hr knew about mandelson, he should resign [241] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what h4 knew about mandelson, he should resign [242] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what h3 knew about mandelson, he should resign [243] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he jnew about mandelson, he should resign [244] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he mnew about mandelson, he should resign [245] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he lnew about mandelson, he should resign [246] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he onew about mandelson, he should resign [247] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he inew about mandelson, he should resign [248] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kbew about mandelson, he should resign [249] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kmew about mandelson, he should resign [250] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kjew about mandelson, he should resign [251] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he khew about mandelson, he should resign [252] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knww about mandelson, he should resign [253] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knsw about mandelson, he should resign [254] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kndw about mandelson, he should resign [255] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knrw about mandelson, he should resign [256] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kn4w about mandelson, he should resign [257] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kn3w about mandelson, he should resign [258] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kneq about mandelson, he should resign [259] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knea about mandelson, he should resign [260] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knes about mandelson, he should resign [261] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knee about mandelson, he should resign [262] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kne3 about mandelson, he should resign [263] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he kne2 about mandelson, he should resign [264] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew zbout mandelson, he should resign [265] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew sbout mandelson, he should resign [266] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew wbout mandelson, he should resign [267] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew qbout mandelson, he should resign [268] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew avout mandelson, he should resign [269] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew anout mandelson, he should resign [270] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew ahout mandelson, he should resign [271] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew agout mandelson, he should resign [272] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abiut mandelson, he should resign [273] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abkut mandelson, he should resign [274] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew ablut mandelson, he should resign [275] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abput mandelson, he should resign [276] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew ab0ut mandelson, he should resign [277] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew ab9ut mandelson, he should resign [278] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew aboyt mandelson, he should resign [279] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew aboht mandelson, he should resign [280] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abojt mandelson, he should resign [281] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew aboit mandelson, he should resign [282] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abo8t mandelson, he should resign [283] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abo7t mandelson, he should resign [284] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abour mandelson, he should resign [285] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abouf mandelson, he should resign [286] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew aboug mandelson, he should resign [287] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abouy mandelson, he should resign [288] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abou6 mandelson, he should resign [289] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew abou5 mandelson, he should resign [290] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about nandelson, he should resign [291] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about kandelson, he should resign [292] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about jandelson, he should resign [293] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mzndelson, he should resign [294] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about msndelson, he should resign [295] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mwndelson, he should resign [296] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mqndelson, he should resign [297] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mabdelson, he should resign [298] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mamdelson, he should resign [299] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about majdelson, he should resign [300] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mahdelson, he should resign [301] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about manselson, he should resign [302] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about manxelson, he should resign [303] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mancelson, he should resign [304] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about manfelson, he should resign [305] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about manrelson, he should resign [306] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about maneelson, he should resign [307] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandwlson, he should resign [308] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandslson, he should resign [309] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about manddlson, he should resign [310] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandrlson, he should resign [311] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mand4lson, he should resign [312] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mand3lson, he should resign [313] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandekson, he should resign [314] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandepson, he should resign [315] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandeoson, he should resign [316] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelaon, he should resign [317] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelzon, he should resign [318] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelxon, he should resign [319] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandeldon, he should resign [320] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandeleon, he should resign [321] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelwon, he should resign [322] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsin, he should resign [323] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelskn, he should resign [324] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsln, he should resign [325] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelspn, he should resign [326] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandels0n, he should resign [327] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandels9n, he should resign [328] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsob, he should resign [329] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsom, he should resign [330] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsoj, he should resign [331] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsoh, he should resign [332] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsonm he should resign [333] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsonk he should resign [334] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelsonl he should resign [335] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson. he should resign [336] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson he should resign [337] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, ge should resign [338] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, be should resign [339] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, ne should resign [340] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, je should resign [341] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, ue should resign [342] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, ye should resign [343] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, hw should resign [344] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, hs should resign [345] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, hd should resign [346] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, hr should resign [347] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, h4 should resign [348] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, h3 should resign [349] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he ahould resign [350] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he zhould resign [351] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he xhould resign [352] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he dhould resign [353] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he ehould resign [354] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he whould resign [355] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sgould resign [356] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sbould resign [357] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he snould resign [358] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sjould resign [359] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he suould resign [360] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he syould resign [361] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shiuld resign [362] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shkuld resign [363] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shluld resign [364] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shpuld resign [365] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sh0uld resign [366] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sh9uld resign [367] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoyld resign [368] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shohld resign [369] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shojld resign [370] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoild resign [371] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sho8ld resign [372] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he sho7ld resign [373] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoukd resign [374] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoupd resign [375] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shouod resign [376] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shouls resign [377] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoulx resign [378] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoulc resign [379] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoulf resign [380] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoulr resign [381] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he shoule resign [382] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should eesign [383] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should design [384] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should fesign [385] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should tesign [386] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should 5esign [387] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should 4esign [388] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rwsign [389] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rssign [390] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rdsign [391] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rrsign [392] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should r4sign [393] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should r3sign [394] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should reaign [395] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rezign [396] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rexign [397] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should redign [398] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should reeign [399] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should rewign [400] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resugn [401] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resjgn [402] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should reskgn [403] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resogn [404] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should res9gn [405] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should res8gn [406] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resifn [407] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resivn [408] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resibn [409] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resihn [410] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resiyn [411] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resitn [412] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resigb [413] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resigm [414] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resigj [415] => dan hodges: if starmer can’t (or won’t) tell us what he knew about mandelson, he should resigh ) </h1> </body>