Solwd

Latest News

  • Home
  • News
  • Web
×
 Posted in Web

Appeals court backs contempt finding against Apple, but reopens a door …

 December 11, 2025

A federal appeals court on Thursday backed a ruling that held Apple in civil contempt for brazenly defying an order designed to open its iPhone app store to other payment systems besides its own …

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/appeals-court-backs-contempt-finding-against-apple-but-reopens-a-door-for-iphone-app-fees/

Post navigation

← After rare down year, this perennial CT high school football power is back in championship chase
High-stakes Indiana redistricting vote tests Republican resistance to Trump’s demands →

Copyright © 2026 Solwd

Appeals court backs contempt finding against Apple, but reopens a door … <body> <h1> Array ( [0] => zppeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [1] => sppeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [2] => wppeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [3] => qppeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [4] => aopeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [5] => alpeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [6] => a-peals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [7] => a0peals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [8] => apoeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [9] => apleals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [10] => ap-eals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [11] => ap0eals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [12] => appwals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [13] => appsals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [14] => appdals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [15] => apprals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [16] => app4als court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [17] => app3als court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [18] => appezls court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [19] => appesls court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [20] => appewls court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [21] => appeqls court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [22] => appeaks court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [23] => appeaps court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [24] => appeaos court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [25] => appeala court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [26] => appealz court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [27] => appealx court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [28] => appeald court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [29] => appeale court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [30] => appealw court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [31] => appeals xourt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [32] => appeals vourt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [33] => appeals fourt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [34] => appeals dourt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [35] => appeals ciurt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [36] => appeals ckurt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [37] => appeals clurt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [38] => appeals cpurt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [39] => appeals c0urt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [40] => appeals c9urt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [41] => appeals coyrt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [42] => appeals cohrt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [43] => appeals cojrt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [44] => appeals coirt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [45] => appeals co8rt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [46] => appeals co7rt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [47] => appeals couet backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [48] => appeals coudt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [49] => appeals couft backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [50] => appeals coutt backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [51] => appeals cou5t backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [52] => appeals cou4t backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [53] => appeals courr backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [54] => appeals courf backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [55] => appeals courg backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [56] => appeals coury backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [57] => appeals cour6 backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [58] => appeals cour5 backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [59] => appeals court vacks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [60] => appeals court nacks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [61] => appeals court hacks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [62] => appeals court gacks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [63] => appeals court bzcks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [64] => appeals court bscks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [65] => appeals court bwcks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [66] => appeals court bqcks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [67] => appeals court baxks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [68] => appeals court bavks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [69] => appeals court bafks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [70] => appeals court badks contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [71] => appeals court bacjs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [72] => appeals court bacms contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [73] => appeals court bacls contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [74] => appeals court bacos contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [75] => appeals court bacis contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [76] => appeals court backa contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [77] => appeals court backz contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [78] => appeals court backx contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [79] => appeals court backd contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [80] => appeals court backe contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [81] => appeals court backw contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [82] => appeals court backs xontempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [83] => appeals court backs vontempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [84] => appeals court backs fontempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [85] => appeals court backs dontempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [86] => appeals court backs cintempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [87] => appeals court backs ckntempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [88] => appeals court backs clntempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [89] => appeals court backs cpntempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [90] => appeals court backs c0ntempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [91] => appeals court backs c9ntempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [92] => appeals court backs cobtempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [93] => appeals court backs comtempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [94] => appeals court backs cojtempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [95] => appeals court backs cohtempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [96] => appeals court backs conrempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [97] => appeals court backs confempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [98] => appeals court backs congempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [99] => appeals court backs conyempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [100] => appeals court backs con6empt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [101] => appeals court backs con5empt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [102] => appeals court backs contwmpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [103] => appeals court backs contsmpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [104] => appeals court backs contdmpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [105] => appeals court backs contrmpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [106] => appeals court backs cont4mpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [107] => appeals court backs cont3mpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [108] => appeals court backs contenpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [109] => appeals court backs contekpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [110] => appeals court backs contejpt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [111] => appeals court backs contemot finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [112] => appeals court backs contemlt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [113] => appeals court backs contem-t finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [114] => appeals court backs contem0t finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [115] => appeals court backs contempr finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [116] => appeals court backs contempf finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [117] => appeals court backs contempg finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [118] => appeals court backs contempy finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [119] => appeals court backs contemp6 finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [120] => appeals court backs contemp5 finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [121] => appeals court backs contempt dinding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [122] => appeals court backs contempt cinding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [123] => appeals court backs contempt vinding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [124] => appeals court backs contempt ginding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [125] => appeals court backs contempt tinding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [126] => appeals court backs contempt rinding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [127] => appeals court backs contempt funding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [128] => appeals court backs contempt fjnding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [129] => appeals court backs contempt fknding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [130] => appeals court backs contempt fonding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [131] => appeals court backs contempt f9nding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [132] => appeals court backs contempt f8nding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [133] => appeals court backs contempt fibding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [134] => appeals court backs contempt fimding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [135] => appeals court backs contempt fijding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [136] => appeals court backs contempt fihding against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [137] => appeals court backs contempt finsing against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [138] => appeals court backs contempt finxing against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [139] => appeals court backs contempt fincing against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [140] => appeals court backs contempt finfing against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [141] => appeals court backs contempt finring against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [142] => appeals court backs contempt fineing against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [143] => appeals court backs contempt findung against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [144] => appeals court backs contempt findjng against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [145] => appeals court backs contempt findkng against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [146] => appeals court backs contempt findong against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [147] => appeals court backs contempt find9ng against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [148] => appeals court backs contempt find8ng against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [149] => appeals court backs contempt findibg against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [150] => appeals court backs contempt findimg against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [151] => appeals court backs contempt findijg against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [152] => appeals court backs contempt findihg against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [153] => appeals court backs contempt findinf against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [154] => appeals court backs contempt findinv against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [155] => appeals court backs contempt findinb against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [156] => appeals court backs contempt findinh against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [157] => appeals court backs contempt findiny against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [158] => appeals court backs contempt findint against apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [159] => appeals court backs contempt finding zgainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [160] => appeals court backs contempt finding sgainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [161] => appeals court backs contempt finding wgainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [162] => appeals court backs contempt finding qgainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [163] => appeals court backs contempt finding afainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [164] => appeals court backs contempt finding avainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [165] => appeals court backs contempt finding abainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [166] => appeals court backs contempt finding ahainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [167] => appeals court backs contempt finding ayainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [168] => appeals court backs contempt finding atainst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [169] => appeals court backs contempt finding agzinst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [170] => appeals court backs contempt finding agsinst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [171] => appeals court backs contempt finding agwinst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [172] => appeals court backs contempt finding agqinst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [173] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaunst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [174] => appeals court backs contempt finding agajnst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [175] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaknst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [176] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaonst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [177] => appeals court backs contempt finding aga9nst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [178] => appeals court backs contempt finding aga8nst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [179] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaibst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [180] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaimst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [181] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaijst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [182] => appeals court backs contempt finding agaihst apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [183] => appeals court backs contempt finding againat apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [184] => appeals court backs contempt finding againzt apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [185] => appeals court backs contempt finding againxt apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [186] => appeals court backs contempt finding againdt apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [187] => appeals court backs contempt finding againet apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [188] => appeals court backs contempt finding againwt apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [189] => appeals court backs contempt finding againsr apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [190] => appeals court backs contempt finding againsf apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [191] => appeals court backs contempt finding againsg apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [192] => appeals court backs contempt finding againsy apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [193] => appeals court backs contempt finding agains6 apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [194] => appeals court backs contempt finding agains5 apple, but reopens a door &#8230; [195] => appeals court backs contempt finding against zpple, but reopens a door &#8230; [196] => appeals court backs contempt finding against spple, but reopens a door &#8230; [197] => appeals court backs contempt finding against wpple, but reopens a door &#8230; [198] => appeals court backs contempt finding against qpple, but reopens a door &#8230; [199] => appeals court backs contempt finding against aople, but reopens a door &#8230; [200] => appeals court backs contempt finding against alple, but reopens a door &#8230; [201] => appeals court backs contempt finding against a-ple, but reopens a door &#8230; [202] => appeals court backs contempt finding against a0ple, but reopens a door &#8230; [203] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apole, but reopens a door &#8230; [204] => appeals court backs contempt finding against aplle, but reopens a door &#8230; [205] => appeals court backs contempt finding against ap-le, but reopens a door &#8230; [206] => appeals court backs contempt finding against ap0le, but reopens a door &#8230; [207] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appke, but reopens a door &#8230; [208] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apppe, but reopens a door &#8230; [209] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appoe, but reopens a door &#8230; [210] => appeals court backs contempt finding against applw, but reopens a door &#8230; [211] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appls, but reopens a door &#8230; [212] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appld, but reopens a door &#8230; [213] => appeals court backs contempt finding against applr, but reopens a door &#8230; [214] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appl4, but reopens a door &#8230; [215] => appeals court backs contempt finding against appl3, but reopens a door &#8230; [216] => appeals court backs contempt finding against applem but reopens a door &#8230; [217] => appeals court backs contempt finding against applek but reopens a door &#8230; [218] => appeals court backs contempt finding against applel but reopens a door &#8230; [219] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple. but reopens a door &#8230; [220] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple but reopens a door &#8230; [221] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, vut reopens a door &#8230; [222] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, nut reopens a door &#8230; [223] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, hut reopens a door &#8230; [224] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, gut reopens a door &#8230; [225] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, byt reopens a door &#8230; [226] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bht reopens a door &#8230; [227] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bjt reopens a door &#8230; [228] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bit reopens a door &#8230; [229] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, b8t reopens a door &#8230; [230] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, b7t reopens a door &#8230; [231] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bur reopens a door &#8230; [232] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, buf reopens a door &#8230; [233] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bug reopens a door &#8230; [234] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, buy reopens a door &#8230; [235] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bu6 reopens a door &#8230; [236] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, bu5 reopens a door &#8230; [237] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but eeopens a door &#8230; [238] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but deopens a door &#8230; [239] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but feopens a door &#8230; [240] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but teopens a door &#8230; [241] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but 5eopens a door &#8230; [242] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but 4eopens a door &#8230; [243] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but rwopens a door &#8230; [244] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but rsopens a door &#8230; [245] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but rdopens a door &#8230; [246] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but rropens a door &#8230; [247] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but r4opens a door &#8230; [248] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but r3opens a door &#8230; [249] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reipens a door &#8230; [250] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but rekpens a door &#8230; [251] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but relpens a door &#8230; [252] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reppens a door &#8230; [253] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but re0pens a door &#8230; [254] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but re9pens a door &#8230; [255] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reooens a door &#8230; [256] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reolens a door &#8230; [257] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reo-ens a door &#8230; [258] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reo0ens a door &#8230; [259] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopwns a door &#8230; [260] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopsns a door &#8230; [261] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopdns a door &#8230; [262] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reoprns a door &#8230; [263] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reop4ns a door &#8230; [264] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reop3ns a door &#8230; [265] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopebs a door &#8230; [266] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopems a door &#8230; [267] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopejs a door &#8230; [268] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopehs a door &#8230; [269] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopena a door &#8230; [270] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopenz a door &#8230; [271] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopenx a door &#8230; [272] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopend a door &#8230; [273] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopene a door &#8230; [274] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopenw a door &#8230; [275] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens z door &#8230; [276] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens s door &#8230; [277] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens w door &#8230; [278] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens q door &#8230; [279] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a soor &#8230; [280] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a xoor &#8230; [281] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a coor &#8230; [282] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a foor &#8230; [283] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a roor &#8230; [284] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a eoor &#8230; [285] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dior &#8230; [286] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dkor &#8230; [287] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dlor &#8230; [288] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dpor &#8230; [289] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a d0or &#8230; [290] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a d9or &#8230; [291] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a doir &#8230; [292] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dokr &#8230; [293] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dolr &#8230; [294] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dopr &#8230; [295] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a do0r &#8230; [296] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a do9r &#8230; [297] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dooe &#8230; [298] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a dood &#8230; [299] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a doof &#8230; [300] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a doot &#8230; [301] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a doo5 &#8230; [302] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a doo4 &#8230; [303] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#7230; [304] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#u230; [305] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#i230; [306] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#9230; [307] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8130; [308] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8q30; [309] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8w30; [310] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8330; [311] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8220; [312] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#82w0; [313] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#82e0; [314] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8240; [315] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#8239; [316] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#823o; [317] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#823p; [318] => appeals court backs contempt finding against apple, but reopens a door &#823-; ) </h1> </body>