Furious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000

September 5, 2025

Husband and wife Adi Bhargava and Sugandha Rana, who live with their four-year-old daughter in Ealing, west London , were first approached by Naman Pathak, in March 2022.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15060649/family-unable-use-garden-three-years-developer-scaffolding.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

durious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, curious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, vurious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, gurious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, turious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, rurious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fyrious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fhrious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fjrious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, firious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, f8rious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, f7rious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fueious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fudious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fufious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, futious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fu5ious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fu4ious family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furuous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furjous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furkous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furoous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fur9ous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, fur8ous family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiius family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furikus family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furilus family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furipus family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furi0us family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furi9us family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furioys family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiohs family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiojs family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiois family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furio8s family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furio7s family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furioua family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiouz family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furioux family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furioud family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furioue family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furiouw family left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious damily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious camily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious vamily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious gamily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious tamily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious ramily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fzmily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fsmily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fwmily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fqmily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fanily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fakily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fajily left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famuly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famjly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famkly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famoly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fam9ly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious fam8ly left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famiky left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famipy left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famioy left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious familt left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious familg left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious familh left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious familu left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famil7 left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious famil6 left unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family keft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family peft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family oeft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lwft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lsft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family ldft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lrft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family l4ft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family l3ft unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family ledt unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lect unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family levt unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family legt unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lett unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lert unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lefr unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family leff unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lefg unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lefy unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lef6 unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family lef5 unable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left ynable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left hnable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left jnable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left inable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left 8nable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left 7nable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left ubable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left umable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left ujable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left uhable to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unzble to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unsble to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unwble to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unqble to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unavle to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unanle to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unahle to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unagle to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabke to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabpe to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unaboe to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unablw to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabls to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabld to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unablr to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabl4 to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unabl3 to use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unable ro use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000, furious family left unable fo use their back garden for three years after developer puts up scaffolding and then stonewalls them – while owing them £50,000