It isn’t only late-night TV hosts who have the freedom to criticize the powerful. It’s not just the press that depends on the First Amendment.

Yelp restaurant reviews and Sunday worship services; snarky T-shirts and campaign contributions; art galleries and Little Free Libraries on neighborhood corners; ultra-local news websites and cheerful “gay takeovers” of Orlando eateries and yes, spreading flags with neo-Nazi slogans on I-4 overpasses or near the entrances to theme parks — all these are rooted in First Amendment rights.

It is why one person can stand on a corner holding a sign criticizing President Trump and another can stand across the street with a sign praising him.

Freedom of speech is so pervasive in our lives that we take it for granted. A temporarily silenced Jimmy Kimmel reminded us why we can’t.

Not a political weapon

The First Amendment guarantees freedom from government interference in expression. It bars any government from forcing speech or silence on its citizens. It prohibits government retaliation for either.

It is not a weapon to be used on political opponents.

Certainly, free speech carries a price. Most businesses — and even governmental agencies — can discipline or even fire their own employees for speaking in a way that disrupts the workplace or misrepresents an employer, as anyone who has yelled at a boss can attest. A podcaster can be sued for libel, as can this newspaper.

Moviegoers can be banned by a theater owner for shouting “Fire” when there is none. But these are not governmental interferences in speech.

It’s true that the government can criminally prosecute people conspiring to overthrow elections, plan criminal activities or incite riots. But such government exemptions are few and narrowly tailored.

 A right to be wrong

Americans have a right to be wrong, obnoxiously so, without having to fear government retribution — as it protected the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for saying he had a dream and Lincoln for redefining America in 272 words at Gettysburg. At the time, many Americans thought both leaders were very wrong.

It also protects President Trump’s right to call Charlie Kirk’s critics “a radical left group of lunatics,” whether it’s true or not.

But if the president uses the Department of Justice to harass, persecute or arrest them, then he is using the government to crush free speech.

If his Federal Communication Commission coerces broadcast companies into firing a TV host, that is using the government to muzzle critics.

It’s an open question whether Trump understands the distinction.

Illegal? No, Mr. President

In a press conference last week, the most powerful man in the world complained that the press will “take a great story and make it bad … I think it’s really illegal.”

It isn’t.

Even if Trump is the first president in 250 years to not appreciate it, his attorney general and Ivy League-educated advisers studied the First Amendment in law school.

They are rolling the dice that Americans are too resource-poor or too cowed to take on the full might of the federal government, and that universities and huge corporations are too frightened or too greedy to stand up for the same speech that made their reputation and fattened their balance sheets.

Look for Trump to promise that only his designated “bad guys” — broadcasters, Democrats and journalists — will be silenced by his war on free speech, and that ordinary Americans stand to lose nothing.

But think how quickly Trump’s promise to deport only immigrant murderers and rapists expanded greatly to include indiscriminate roundups and the forced detention of U.S. citizens. Now hundreds of those known to have been detained at the Everglades facility Florida officials dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz” are missing.

In fact, ordinary Americans stand to lose everything.

It’s first for a reason

Without free speech, other rights begin to crumble. A woman may have the right to vote, but if she doesn’t have the right to loudly criticize people trying to take it away, she will not have it for long.

No president had more reason to detest the First Amendment than George Washington. Hailed when inaugurated, he was reviled in the press by his second term, as political parties started taking shape and hurling insults. He was urged to strike back:  Impertinence must be punished, declared one newspaper of Washington’s critics.

Impertinence won. Washington wanted it to. He hated the criticism, but he understood the alternative.

Erase free speech, he said, and “dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.”

To strongman rulers, a citizen’s protected speech is the most dangerous thing in the world. It breaks through everywhere. When it does, democracy follows. Trump is trying to stop that. Don’t let him.

The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board includes Executive Editor Roger Simmons, Opinion Editor Krys Fluker and Viewpoints Editor Jay Reddick. The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board consists of Executive Editor Gretchen Day-Bryant, Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney and editorial writers Pat Beall and Martin Dyckman. Send letters to insight@orlandosentinel.com.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/10/01/without-free-speech-we-have-nothing-editorial/