The Growing Poverty Of Political Debate

Submitted by Amir Taheri of the Gatestone Institute

As the year 2018 draws to a close, what are the trends that it highlighted in political life?

The first trend represents a growing global disaffection with international organizations to the benefit of the traditional nation-state. Supporters of the status quo regard that trend as an upsurge of populism and judge it as a setback for human progress whatever that means.

Today it is not the United Nations alone that is reduced to a backseat driver on key issues of international life. Its many tentacles, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, too, have been reduced to a shadow of their past glory. In the 1990s, the two outfits held sway on the economies of more than 80 countries across the globe with a mixture of ideology and credit injection. Today, however, they are reduced to cheer-leading or name-calling from the ringside.

The European Union, too, is clearly on the decline. Despite Pollyannish talk of creating a European army and closer ties among member states, the EU has lost much of its original appeal and faces fissiparous challenges of which the so-called Brexit is one early example. I believe that the only way for the EU to survive, let alone prosper, is to recast itself as a club of nation-states rather than a substitute for them.

Less than a decade ago, the German philosopher Jürgen Habermas and the German Pope Benedict XVI claimed that the nation-state was dead and that in Europe at least, the way to salvation was a revival of Christianity as a cultural bond if not as a traditional faith.

The weakening of political parties, trade unions, international organs, and institutions like parliaments that provided platforms for debate and decision-making, has deprived many societies of both a space and a mechanism for the battle of ideas and the competition among different policy options. (Image source: iStock)

However, the trend towards decline has also affected almost all Christian churches, especially where and when they tried to cast themselves as political actors.

A similar decline could be seen in all other international groupings ranging from the African Union to the Organization of the American States, and passing by the Arab League, the Russian-led Eurasian bloc, the Gulf Cooperation Council, and the South American Mercosur.

Another significant trend concerns the virtual collapse of almost all political parties across the globe. Even in the United States and Great Britain, which have the oldest and most solidly established tradition of party politics, the system has been severely shaken.

In the US the Democrat Party has morphed into a hodgepodge of groups from crypto-Marxists to bleeding-heart liberals held together by little more than their common hatred for President Donald J Trump. For its part, the Republican Party, first shaken by the so-called Tea Party, has been reduced to second fiddle for the Trumpist “revolution”.

In Great Britain, Brexit has divided the two main parties, Conservative and Labour, into three factions that could, in time, morph into separate parties. For at least two centuries, Britain’s power was mainly based on the stability of its institutions and the ability of its political elite to meet every challenge with a firm attachment to the rule of law plus moderation. All that edifice has been shaken by Brexit.

In France and Italy, insurrectionary parties have wrested power away from the traditional ones. In France, the Gaullist and Socialist parties that governed the country for seven decades have been pushed to the sidelines by the République En Marche movement of Emmanuel Macron which, in turn, is now shaken by the “Yellow Vests” insurrectionary outfit.

In Italy, too, all traditional parties, have been driven off stage by populist groupings of both left and right.
In Germany, the Alternative für Deutschland(AFD) has cut across the left-right divide to win a leading role in national politics. Even a well-established regional party such as Christian Social Union (CSU) is now in decline in its home-base of Bavaria.

Within the year now ending, a number of mostly new parties forced their ways into the center of power in several European countries notably Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Holland and Sweden.

Interestingly, the more ideological a party is, the more vulnerable it is to the current trend of decline in party politics. This is why virtually all Communist and nationalist parties have either disappeared or been reduced to a shadow of their past glory.

Separatist parties, including in the Basque country and Catalonia in Spain, have achieved nothing but an upsurge of chauvinism within the ethnic Castilian majority.

Another trend that took shape in 2018 concerns the emergence of single-issue politics, replacing debate on large overarching policies, as the norm in many countries.

Once again, Brexit in Britain was the most glaring example. Those seeking withdrawal from the European Union appeared prepared to ignore all other issues provided they could promote that single quest, not to say obsession.

The massive development of cyberspace has given single-issue politics an unexpected boost. Today, almost anyone anywhere in the word could create his or her own echo-chamber around a pet subject from Frisian secession to saving the polar bears from extinction, shutting out the outside world and its many other concerns. Here, the aim is to fight for one’s difference with as much passion as possible.

That trend is in contrast with another trend, promoted by the traditional, or mainstream media, offering a uniform narrative of events.

Turn on any TV or radio channel and go through almost any newspaper and you will be surprised by how they all say the same thing about what is going on. Thanks to a sharp decline in field reporting, mostly caused by financial constraints, mainstream media today have to depend on a narrow compass provided by a few agencies and/or “citizen” journalists.

That, in turn, encourages the growing belief that facts are nothing but opinions expressed in the manner of shibboleths.

All that leads to an impoverishment of political debate. The weakening of political parties, trade unions, international organs, and institutions like parliaments that provided platforms for debate and decision-making, has deprived many societies of both a space and a mechanism for the battle of ideas and the competition among different policy options.

The bad news is that 2018 was not a good year for pluralist politics. The good news is that 2019 may expose the fundamental flaws of fissiparous populism.

The Growing Poverty Of Political Debate <body> <h1> Array ( [0] => rhe growing poverty of political debate [1] => fhe growing poverty of political debate [2] => ghe growing poverty of political debate [3] => yhe growing poverty of political debate [4] => 6he growing poverty of political debate [5] => 5he growing poverty of political debate [6] => tge growing poverty of political debate [7] => tbe growing poverty of political debate [8] => tne growing poverty of political debate [9] => tje growing poverty of political debate [10] => tue growing poverty of political debate [11] => tye growing poverty of political debate [12] => thw growing poverty of political debate [13] => ths growing poverty of political debate [14] => thd growing poverty of political debate [15] => thr growing poverty of political debate [16] => th4 growing poverty of political debate [17] => th3 growing poverty of political debate [18] => the frowing poverty of political debate [19] => the vrowing poverty of political debate [20] => the browing poverty of political debate [21] => the hrowing poverty of political debate [22] => the yrowing poverty of political debate [23] => the trowing poverty of political debate [24] => the geowing poverty of political debate [25] => the gdowing poverty of political debate [26] => the gfowing poverty of political debate [27] => the gtowing poverty of political debate [28] => the g5owing poverty of political debate [29] => the g4owing poverty of political debate [30] => the griwing poverty of political debate [31] => the grkwing poverty of political debate [32] => the grlwing poverty of political debate [33] => the grpwing poverty of political debate [34] => the gr0wing poverty of political debate [35] => the gr9wing poverty of political debate [36] => the groqing poverty of political debate [37] => the groaing poverty of political debate [38] => the grosing poverty of political debate [39] => the groeing poverty of political debate [40] => the gro3ing poverty of political debate [41] => the gro2ing poverty of political debate [42] => the growung poverty of political debate [43] => the growjng poverty of political debate [44] => the growkng poverty of political debate [45] => the growong poverty of political debate [46] => the grow9ng poverty of political debate [47] => the grow8ng poverty of political debate [48] => the growibg poverty of political debate [49] => the growimg poverty of political debate [50] => the growijg poverty of political debate [51] => the growihg poverty of political debate [52] => the growinf poverty of political debate [53] => the growinv poverty of political debate [54] => the growinb poverty of political debate [55] => the growinh poverty of political debate [56] => the growiny poverty of political debate [57] => the growint poverty of political debate [58] => the growing ooverty of political debate [59] => the growing loverty of political debate [60] => the growing -overty of political debate [61] => the growing 0overty of political debate [62] => the growing piverty of political debate [63] => the growing pkverty of political debate [64] => the growing plverty of political debate [65] => the growing ppverty of political debate [66] => the growing p0verty of political debate [67] => the growing p9verty of political debate [68] => the growing pocerty of political debate [69] => the growing poberty of political debate [70] => the growing pogerty of political debate [71] => the growing poferty of political debate [72] => the growing povwrty of political debate [73] => the growing povsrty of political debate [74] => the growing povdrty of political debate [75] => the growing povrrty of political debate [76] => the growing pov4rty of political debate [77] => the growing pov3rty of political debate [78] => the growing poveety of political debate [79] => the growing povedty of political debate [80] => the growing povefty of political debate [81] => the growing povetty of political debate [82] => the growing pove5ty of political debate [83] => the growing pove4ty of political debate [84] => the growing poverry of political debate [85] => the growing poverfy of political debate [86] => the growing povergy of political debate [87] => the growing poveryy of political debate [88] => the growing pover6y of political debate [89] => the growing pover5y of political debate [90] => the growing povertt of political debate [91] => the growing povertg of political debate [92] => the growing poverth of political debate [93] => the growing povertu of political debate [94] => the growing povert7 of political debate [95] => the growing povert6 of political debate [96] => the growing poverty if political debate [97] => the growing poverty kf political debate [98] => the growing poverty lf political debate [99] => the growing poverty pf political debate [100] => the growing poverty 0f political debate [101] => the growing poverty 9f political debate [102] => the growing poverty od political debate [103] => the growing poverty oc political debate [104] => the growing poverty ov political debate [105] => the growing poverty og political debate [106] => the growing poverty ot political debate [107] => the growing poverty or political debate [108] => the growing poverty of oolitical debate [109] => the growing poverty of lolitical debate [110] => the growing poverty of -olitical debate [111] => the growing poverty of 0olitical debate [112] => the growing poverty of pilitical debate [113] => the growing poverty of pklitical debate [114] => the growing poverty of pllitical debate [115] => the growing poverty of pplitical debate [116] => the growing poverty of p0litical debate [117] => the growing poverty of p9litical debate [118] => the growing poverty of pokitical debate [119] => the growing poverty of popitical debate [120] => the growing poverty of pooitical debate [121] => the growing poverty of polutical debate [122] => the growing poverty of poljtical debate [123] => the growing poverty of polktical debate [124] => the growing poverty of polotical debate [125] => the growing poverty of pol9tical debate [126] => the growing poverty of pol8tical debate [127] => the growing poverty of polirical debate [128] => the growing poverty of polifical debate [129] => the growing poverty of poligical debate [130] => the growing poverty of poliyical debate [131] => the growing poverty of poli6ical debate [132] => the growing poverty of poli5ical debate [133] => the growing poverty of politucal debate [134] => the growing poverty of politjcal debate [135] => the growing poverty of politkcal debate [136] => the growing poverty of politocal debate [137] => the growing poverty of polit9cal debate [138] => the growing poverty of polit8cal debate [139] => the growing poverty of politixal debate [140] => the growing poverty of politival debate [141] => the growing poverty of politifal debate [142] => the growing poverty of politidal debate [143] => the growing poverty of politiczl debate [144] => the growing poverty of politicsl debate [145] => the growing poverty of politicwl debate [146] => the growing poverty of politicql debate [147] => the growing poverty of politicak debate [148] => the growing poverty of politicap debate [149] => the growing poverty of politicao debate [150] => the growing poverty of political sebate [151] => the growing poverty of political xebate [152] => the growing poverty of political cebate [153] => the growing poverty of political febate [154] => the growing poverty of political rebate [155] => the growing poverty of political eebate [156] => the growing poverty of political dwbate [157] => the growing poverty of political dsbate [158] => the growing poverty of political ddbate [159] => the growing poverty of political drbate [160] => the growing poverty of political d4bate [161] => the growing poverty of political d3bate [162] => the growing poverty of political devate [163] => the growing poverty of political denate [164] => the growing poverty of political dehate [165] => the growing poverty of political degate [166] => the growing poverty of political debzte [167] => the growing poverty of political debste [168] => the growing poverty of political debwte [169] => the growing poverty of political debqte [170] => the growing poverty of political debare [171] => the growing poverty of political debafe [172] => the growing poverty of political debage [173] => the growing poverty of political debaye [174] => the growing poverty of political deba6e [175] => the growing poverty of political deba5e [176] => the growing poverty of political debatw [177] => the growing poverty of political debats [178] => the growing poverty of political debatd [179] => the growing poverty of political debatr [180] => the growing poverty of political debat4 [181] => the growing poverty of political debat3 ) </h1> </body>